Glucose Intolerance in an Employed Population

43Citations
Citations of this article
27Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Mikuni, E., Ohoshi, T., Hayashi, K. and Miyamura, K. Glucose Intolerance in an Employed Population. Tohoku J. exp. Med., 1983, 141, Suppl., 251-256——Differences in glucose intolerance within various occupational groups, i.e. laborers, clerks, and managers, and the related environmental factors were studied in ca. 9000 male workers of a certain factory. Age-and weight-adjusted prevalence rates of glucose intolerance were 3.2% in the laborers, 5.8% in the clerks, and 9.3% in the managers. In the managers, the total intake of calories was excessive for the amount of exercise expended; food intake was relatively low in complex carbohydrates and high in animal fats. The clerks were characterized by a high sugar intake. The low prevalence of glucose intolerance in the laborers was ascribed to the greater amount of exercise. Assigned work hours, however, probably affected the prevalence of diabetes in the laborers, which was 2.1% in subjects who worked all three shifts, but 0.9% in subjects working only day shifts. Thirty laborers from all 3 shifts consented to give urine specimens during their working time (8 hr), after the same amount of food and exercise in all of them. Urinary excretionn of HGH and VMA during the midnight shift was significantly higher (p <0.05) than that during the day shift although urinary 170HCS was significantly low (p <0.01) at midnight. There were no significant changes in urinary CPR excretion between day and night shifts. These data indicate the importance of environmental factors, such as exercise, nutrition and stress, in glucose intolerance.————occupation; diabtes mellitus; shift workers; stress; urinary human growth hormone. © 1983, Tohoku University Medical Press. All rights reserved.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Mikuni, E., Ohoshi, T., Hayashi, K., & Mlyamura, K. (1983). Glucose Intolerance in an Employed Population. The Tohoku Journal of Experimental Medicine, 141, 251–256. https://doi.org/10.1620/tjem.141.Suppl_251

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free