A comparison of aggregate p-value methods and multivariate statistics for self-contained tests of metabolic pathway analysis

0Citations
Citations of this article
31Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

For pathway analysis of genomic data, the most common methods involve combining p-values from individual statistical tests. However, there are several multivariate statistical methods that can be used to test whether a pathway has changed. Because of the large number of variables and pathway sizes in genomics data, some of these statistics cannot be computed. However, in metabolomics data, the number of variables and pathway sizes are typically much smaller, making such computations feasible. Of particular interest is being able to detect changes in pathways that may not be detected for the individual variables. We compare the performance of both the p-value methods and multivariate statistics for self-contained tests with an extensive simulation study and a human metabolomics study. Permutation tests, rather than asymptotic results are used to assess the statistical significance of the pathways. Furthermore, both one and two-sided alternatives hypotheses are examined. From the human metabolomic study, many pathways were statistically significant, although the majority of the individual variables in the pathway were not. Overall, the p-value methods perform at least as well as the multivariate statistics for these scenarios.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Mitchell, M. W. (2015). A comparison of aggregate p-value methods and multivariate statistics for self-contained tests of metabolic pathway analysis. PLoS ONE, 10(4). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0125081

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free