Comparison of conditional power criteria for early termination of clinical trials

2Citations
Citations of this article
7Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

A comparison between various conditional power (CP) criteria for early termination of a trial is performed. It is assumed the trial is carried out to decide on the hypotheses H0 that an effect size θ is not larger than θ0, and the alternative H1, with a sample size determined to yield a specified power under a certain value θ1. Early stopping for H0 or H1 may be based on CP(θ0),CP(θ1), or CP evaluated at any pre-specified value θ̃; further, one can rely on data-driven versions, such as CP(θ̂) or CP(θ̂ ± s.e.(θ̂)), θ̂ being a current estimate of θ with standard error s.e.(θ̂). The procedures considered are interpreted as sequential tests. Power functions are computed under normally distributed or binary responses; the benefits are compared using average and median sample numbers. The investigations have shown that often the choice of the argument for CP is not a too crucial point, if adapted stopping boundaries for CP are computed. However, the type I error requires particular attention, if a nuisance parameter is involved. Data-driven strategies suffer from the instability of the estimate θ̂ in early stages of the trial. For early futility stopping, adequate CP approaches with pre-specified θ̃ show properties in the range of those based on θ̂ or θ̂ + s.e.(θ̂). © 2003 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Högel, J., & Kron, M. (2004). Comparison of conditional power criteria for early termination of clinical trials. Computational Statistics and Data Analysis, 46(2), 377–395. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-9473(03)00172-5

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free