Comparisons among the diagnostic methods used for the detection of extra-pulmonary tuberculosis in Bangladesh

4Citations
Citations of this article
21Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

The present study was an attempt to establish a suitable method for the effective diagnosis of extra-pulmonary tuberculosis in Bangladesh. In this regard, detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis from 390 different extra-pulmonary specimens was performed by Bright-Field microscopy, light-emitting diode fluorescence microscopy and Lowenstein-Jensen culture methods, followed by an extensive comparison among these methods. M. tuberculosis was detected in 53 cases through the conventional Lowenstein-Jensen culture method; 49 cases were detected under Bright-Field microscope, whereas the light-emitting diode fluorescence microscopy detected 64 cases. Out of 53 culture-positive isolates, 12 were found to be multi-drug resistant. Light-emitting diode fluorescence microscopy was found to be more sensitive and effective than both the Bright-Field microscopy and the Lowenstein-Jensen culture methods. Incidentally, light-emitting diode fluorescence microscopy appeared imperative to detecting the multi-drug resistant tuberculosis. © 2012 Asian-African Society for Mycobacteriology.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Munshi, S. K., Rahman, F., Mostofa Kamal, S. M., & Noor, R. (2012). Comparisons among the diagnostic methods used for the detection of extra-pulmonary tuberculosis in Bangladesh. International Journal of Mycobacteriology, 1(4), 190–195. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmyco.2012.10.004

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free