Standardization of the definition of the types of oncological colectomy. Delphi method for consensus of experts of the Spanish Association of Surgeons

0Citations
Citations of this article
10Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

There is no international consensus on the definition of the type of oncological resection that corresponds to each of the colectomies existing in the current literature. The objective is to define for each colectomy described in the literature: embryological dissection plane, vascular pedicles in which to perform central ligation, the extent of the colectomy and the need for resection of the greater omentum. A consensus of experts is carried out through the Delphi methodology through two rounds from the Coloproctology Section of the Spanish Association of Surgeons. Study period: November 2021-January 2023. 120 experts were surveyed. Degrees of consensus: Very strong: >90%, strong: 80-90%, moderate: 50-80%, non-consensus: < 50%. The definition for each oncological colectomy was established by very strong and strong recommendations. Each oncological colectomy was established by right hemicolectomy (RHC), RHC with D3 lymphadenectomy, extended-RHC, transverse colon segmentary colectomy, splenic flexure segmentary colectomy, subtotal colectomy, total, left hemicolectomy (LHC), extended-LHC, sigmoidectomy.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Garcia-Granero, A., Martín-Martín, G. P., Dujovne-Lindenbaum, P., Alvarez Laso, C. J., Cerdán-Santacruz, C., Flor-Lorente, B., … Fernández-López, F. (2024). Standardization of the definition of the types of oncological colectomy. Delphi method for consensus of experts of the Spanish Association of Surgeons. Cirugia Espanola, 102(9), 484–494. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ciresp.2024.05.009

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free