Big 4 auditing companies, earnings manipulation and earnings conservatism: Evidence from an emerging market

8Citations
Citations of this article
62Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

This study focuses on South African listed companies and investigates the relation between Big 4 auditing companies, earnings management and earnings conservatism. It shows that companies audited by a Big 4 auditor leads to a more timely recognition of large losses and to lower levels of earnings manipulation and higher conditional conservatism. The findings report that the conditional form of conservatism is negatively related to unconditional conservatism. Higher conservatism is also reported for firms with high leverage and those that convey bad news. The opposite has been found for firms with high growth. The findings, in general support the notion that the new Companies’ Act in South Africa and the King III are effective corporate governance tools and the observed cases of corporate failure May be due to other factors, including management hubris.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Mokoaleli-Mokoteli, T., & Iatridis, G. E. (2017). Big 4 auditing companies, earnings manipulation and earnings conservatism: Evidence from an emerging market. Investment Management and Financial Innovations, 14(1), 35–45. https://doi.org/10.21511/imfi.14(1).2017.04

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free