Investigating the applicability of sustainable urban form and design to traditional cities, case study: The old city of sana'a

14Citations
Citations of this article
43Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

This research compared the traditional urban form of old Sana'a with the modern by applying three main basic principles of sustainability; 1. Form and density, 2. Walkability and connectivity and 3. Building energy. The method of inquiry was based on qualitative and quantitative methods and analysis using GIS, ECOTECT and Space Syntax modelling. The findings show that traditional form with its higher building density and compactness is a good model with regards to sustainable principles. Similarly, as to walkability index, traditional layout has higher rates of intersections and connected nodes and least angular changes with higher rates of integrations and choices in terms of Space Syntax properties than new layouts. Finally, the result of applying ECOTECT for urban solar analysis to confirm that the traditional pattern achieved sufficient values of solar access, exposure and shadows over different periods of the year. The overall results indicate that the traditional urban layout is more sustainable in terms of form and density, walkability and connectivity and urban solar energy than the new layouts.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Ali, H. H., Al-Hashimi, I. A., & Al-Samman, F. (2018). Investigating the applicability of sustainable urban form and design to traditional cities, case study: The old city of sana’a. Archnet-IJAR: International Journal of Architectural Research, 12(2), 57–80. https://doi.org/10.26687/archnet-ijar.v12i2.1391

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free