Semi-quantitative ergonomic analysis of the biomechanical constraints within the cervical spine among screen-operators in the Tunisian universities

0Citations
Citations of this article
28Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Introduction: This study aims to evaluate the biomechanical constraints associated with neck pain among screen-operators. Methods: We conducted an ergonomic study of 325 screen-operators in 25 Tunisian universities based on an anthropometric evaluation of on-screen work and on a semi-quantitative analysis of video recordings of the activities of employees over a representative period of 30 minutes. Results: The prevalence of neck pain was 72.3% in a working population who had to seat in an unsuitable chair and to use an unsuitable worktop (84.6%) and a screen too low with regard to horizontal gaze (81.2%). A semi-quantitative analysis, using video recording of the workstation, concluded that the nape flexed more than 40 degrees for 69% of overall working time. Lateral flexion was observed for 50.3% of working time and right or left rotation for 57.4% of working time. Thus, the most limiting head posture on a postural and gestural level was observed when screen-operators read on a computer screen, had an incorrect positioning of the keyboard and consulted documents. Conclusion: Our results highlight the importance of biomechanical constraints associated with a design of on-screen work which is not in accordance with the ergonomically recommended anthropometric dimensions. These constraints are associated with a high prevalence of neck pain, reflecting the need to ensure an ergonomic design of workstations in order to prevent this problems.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Omrane, A., Jlassi, O., Kammoun, S., Tka, I., Kraiem, A., Henchi, M. A., … Bouzgarrou, L. (2018). Semi-quantitative ergonomic analysis of the biomechanical constraints within the cervical spine among screen-operators in the Tunisian universities. Pan African Medical Journal, 31. https://doi.org/10.11604/pamj.2018.31.189.12474

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free