Reclaiming Everyday Peace: LOCAL VOICES IN MEASUREMENT AND EVALUATION AFTER WAR

158Citations
Citations of this article
54Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Bringing armed conflicts to an end is difficult; restoring a lasting peace can be considerably harder. Reclaiming Everyday Peace addresses the effectiveness and impact of local level interventions on communities affected by war. Using an innovative methodology to generate participatory numbers, Pamina Firchow finds that communities saturated with external interventions after war do not have substantive higher levels of peacefulness according to community-defined indicators of peace than those with lower levels of interventions. These findings suggest that current international peacebuilding efforts are not very effective at achieving peace by local standards because disproportionate attention is paid to reconstruction, governance and development assistance with little attention paid to community ties and healing. Firchow argues that a more bottom up approach to measuring the effectiveness of peacebuilding is required. By finding ways to effectively communicate local community needs and priorities to the international community, efforts to create an atmosphere for an enduring peace are possible.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Firchow, P. (2018). Reclaiming Everyday Peace: LOCAL VOICES IN MEASUREMENT AND EVALUATION AFTER WAR. Reclaiming Everyday Peace: Local Voices in Measurement and Evaluation after War (pp. 1–193). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108236140

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free