The present study investigated the extent to which an instructional framework of integrating strategy instruction (openended strategy and fill-in-the blanks strategy) with motivation- support affected on reading result for young EFL learners. The central area of exploration included a comparison among three approaches to reading instruction: First, fill-in-the blanks strategy intervention; second, open-ended strategy intervention; and last, a control group which received the conventional reading strategies. The participants were sampled from amongst a group of seventy-seven pre-intermediate EFL learners in a language school in Tehran- Iran based on convenient sampling technique. For the sake of measurement, the researchers administered PET and CELT along with reading strategy based-test to quantify the participants’ current level of knowledge as well as the degree of achievement after treatment. For measurement’s sake, different types of tests such as PET, reading comprehension test (CELT), and reading strategy based- test were employed to quantify the participants’ current level of knowledge as well as the degree of achievement before and after instruction. The result of the present study indicated that the experimental groups had a significant improvement over the control group. Also, the level of learners’ reading engagement during classroom work mediated the instructional effects on reading outcomes. The results of this study can be to the benefit of both EFL and ESL teachers to teach reading comprehension using the student’s critical mind as well as critical involvement in the reading tasks.
CITATION STYLE
Sepehr, R. S., Bagheridoust, E., & Moghaddam, M. Y. (2014). The effect of reading involvement through open-ended strategy vs. Fill-in- the- blanks strategy on young EFL learners’ reading comprehension ability. International Journal of Applied Linguistics and English Literature, 3(6), 124–133. https://doi.org/10.7575/aiac.ijalel.v.3n.6p.124
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.