In this case-control study, cases [community-associated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (CA-MRSA), n=79] and controls [community-associated methicillin-susceptible S. aureus (CA-MSSA), n=36] were defined as a laboratory-confirmed infection in a patient with no previous hospital-associated factors. Skin and soft tissue were the predominant sites of infection, both for cases (671%) and controls (556%). Most of the cases (797%) and controls (778%) were aged <30 years. Investigations did not reveal any significant statistical differences in acquiring a CA-MRSA or CA-MSSA infection. The most common shared risk factors included overcrowding, previous antibiotic usage, existing skin conditions, household exposure to someone with a skin condition, scratches/insect bites, and exposure to healthcare workers. Similar risk factors, identified for both CA-MRSA and CA-MSSA infections, suggest standard hygienic measures and proper treatment guidelines would be beneficial in controlling both CA-MRSA and CA-MSSA in remote communities. © Crown © Published by Cambridge University Press [2010].
CITATION STYLE
Golding, G. R., Levett, P. N., McDonald, R. R., Irvine, J., Nsungu, M., Woods, S., … Mulvey, M. R. (2010). A comparison of risk factors associated with community-associated methicillin-resistant and -susceptible Staphylococcus aureus infections in remote communities. Epidemiology and Infection, 138(5), 730–737. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0950268809991488
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.