Early Versus Late Effort in Dynamic Agencies with Unverifiable Information

6Citations
Citations of this article
6Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

In this paper we analyze a dynamic agency problem where contracting parties do not know the agent’s future productivity at the beginning of the relationship. We consider a two-period model where both the agent and the principal observe the agent’s second-period productivity at the end of the first period. This observation is assumed to be non-verifiable information. We compare long-term contracts with short-term contracts with respect to their suitability to motivate effort in both periods. On the one hand, short-term contracts allow for a better fine-tuning of second-period incentives as they can be aligned with the agent’s second-period productivity. On the other hand, in short-term contracts first-period effort incentives might be distorted as contracts have to be sequentially optimal. Hence, the difference between long-term and short-term contracts is characterized by a trade-off between inducing effort in the first and in the second period. We analyze the determinants of this trade-off and demonstrate its implications for performance measurement and information system design.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Schöndube, J. R. (2008). Early Versus Late Effort in Dynamic Agencies with Unverifiable Information. Business Research, 1(2), 165–186. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03343532

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free