Esophageal atresia: A critical review of management at a single center in Algeria

15Citations
Citations of this article
52Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Summary: The purpose was to study the outcomes and factors affecting the survival of esophageal atresia in our center. A retrospective analysis of 86 cases of esophageal atresia (EA) over a 10-year period was performed with 46 boys and 42 girls. Demographic data, birth weight, gestational age, consanguinity, incidence of associated anomalies, place of delivery, history of feeding, and outcomes were studied. EA with distal tracheoesophageal fistula (TEF) was the commonest type with 58/86 (67%). The percentage of patients with at least one associated anomaly was 52/86 (60%), with 7/86 (8%) who are from consanguineous parents; most commonly associated anomalies were cardiac 13/86 (15%). The average gestational age and birth weight were 36 ± 2 weeks and 2300 ± 570g, respectively. Survival rates for the patients according to the Waterston classification was 80% in group A, 58% in group B, and 25% in group C (three patients died before surgery). Prematurity, the gap between the two ends of the esophagus, and preoperative respiratory status were the most significant factors affecting the survival. Late complication of EA/TEF include respiratory symptoms, especially in the first year, associating tracheomalacia and bronchopulmonary infections in about 24/45 (53%), recurrence of TEF 3/45 (7%), esophageal stricture 26/45 (58%), and gastroesophageal reflux 22/45 (49%). The high incidence of delayed diagnosis, low birth weight, and lack of advanced neonatological management are important contributory factors to the poor outcome. The frequency of late complications highlights the need for multidisciplinary clinics to follow these children's.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Bouguermouh, D., & Salem, A. (2015). Esophageal atresia: A critical review of management at a single center in Algeria. Diseases of the Esophagus, 28(3), 205–210. https://doi.org/10.1111/dote.12174

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free