Data reporting as care infrastructure: Assembling ART registries in Japan, Taiwan, and South Korea

Citations of this article
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text


Collecting and reporting national data has become a routine practice for assisted reproductive technology (ART) governance. This article compares the build-ing of national registries, the making of health statistics, and the utilization of these data in Japan, Taiwan, and South Korea. Instead of viewing data registries as tools for health surveillance or monitoring, we approach them in terms of their effectiveness in gen-erating care. Conceptualizing ART data reporting as care infrastructure, built on Maria Puig de la Bellacasa’s “matters of care,” allows us to compare the extent to which data are collected for strengthening a community’s ethical obligation, presented as indicators that could reflect quality of care and inform evidence-based policy making that promotes clinical practices for healthy outcomes. We find that sociotechnical imagi-naries for ART were shaped by the fact that, in its early stages, in vitro fertilization was considered controversial in Japan, a source of nationalist glory in Taiwan, and a mar-ginal procedure in South Korea. This in turn led to different trajectories of designing national registries in these countries, resulting in different care outcomes. We also point to the importance of mediators, including reflexive medical practitioners, care-centered state bureaucrats, and activists, in translating registry data into better ART health care.




Wu, C. L., Ha, J. O., & Tsuge, A. (2020). Data reporting as care infrastructure: Assembling ART registries in Japan, Taiwan, and South Korea. East Asian Science, Technology and Society, 14(1), 35–59.

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free