Psychological and physical health of organic and conventional farmers: A review

15Citations
Citations of this article
39Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Farmers’ health compared to the general population has been the object of some studies and reviews. Among all factors implied in psychological and physical health, the farming system (i.e., organic or conventional farming) was identified as one of the relevant factors to investigate. This article aims to review the literature established on the comparison between organic and conventional farmers’ health and its correlates. Twenty-nine quantitative or qualitative articles were identified for inclusion (n = 29). Results showed that organic farmers had globally better psychological and physical health than conventional farmers. Effect sizes were small to large; they differed according to the target outcome. In addition, factors correlated with farmers’ health were usually psychological, social, financial, and agricultural. This review of literature encourages further re-search in this area, particularly on developing agricultural models.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

David, L., Dambrun, M., Harrington, R., Streith, M., & Michaud, A. (2021, October 1). Psychological and physical health of organic and conventional farmers: A review. Sustainability (Switzerland). MDPI. https://doi.org/10.3390/su132011384

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free