Abstract
Carruthers presents evidence concerning the cross-modular integration of information in human subjects which appears to support the "cognitive conception of language." According to this conception, language is not just a means of communication, but also a representational medium of thought. However, Carruthers overlooks the possibility that language, in both its communicative and cognitive roles, is a nonrepresentational system of conventional signals - that words are not a medium we think in, but a tool we think with. The evidence he cites is equivocal when it comes to choosing between the cognitive conception and this radical communicative conception of language.
Cite
CITATION STYLE
O’Brien, G., & Opie, J. (2002). Internalizing communication. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 25(6), 694–695. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X02440125
Register to see more suggestions
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.