Background: The authors conducted a study to compare the effectiveness of two dry-field isolation techniques with that of a control technique (no isolation) in reducing spatter from a dental operative site. Methods: The authors designed a benchtop experiment to evaluate spatter patterns after performing simulated occlusal surface preparations on three typodont teeth in a dental manikin. Fluorescein dye served as the marker to enable visualization of the spatter distribution. The authors compared the effectiveness of a nonisolated control consisting of high-volume evacuation (HVE) alone with that of two dry-field isolation techniques: a dental dam with HVE and the Isolite system (Isolite Systems, Santa Barbara, Calif). Results: The authors performed a two-way analysis of variance. Both the Isolite device and the dental dam with HVE exhibited a significant decrease in the number of contaminated squares (P
CITATION STYLE
Dahlke, W. O., Cottam, M. R., Herring, M. C., Leavitt, J. M., Ditmyer, M. M., & Walker, R. S. (2012). Evaluation of the spatter-reduction effectiveness of two dry-field isolation techniques. Journal of the American Dental Association, 143(11), 1199–1204. https://doi.org/10.14219/jada.archive.2012.0064
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.