Evaluation of the spatter-reduction effectiveness of two dry-field isolation techniques

34Citations
Citations of this article
67Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Your institution provides access to this article.

Abstract

Background: The authors conducted a study to compare the effectiveness of two dry-field isolation techniques with that of a control technique (no isolation) in reducing spatter from a dental operative site. Methods: The authors designed a benchtop experiment to evaluate spatter patterns after performing simulated occlusal surface preparations on three typodont teeth in a dental manikin. Fluorescein dye served as the marker to enable visualization of the spatter distribution. The authors compared the effectiveness of a nonisolated control consisting of high-volume evacuation (HVE) alone with that of two dry-field isolation techniques: a dental dam with HVE and the Isolite system (Isolite Systems, Santa Barbara, Calif). Results: The authors performed a two-way analysis of variance. Both the Isolite device and the dental dam with HVE exhibited a significant decrease in the number of contaminated squares (P

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Dahlke, W. O., Cottam, M. R., Herring, M. C., Leavitt, J. M., Ditmyer, M. M., & Walker, R. S. (2012). Evaluation of the spatter-reduction effectiveness of two dry-field isolation techniques. Journal of the American Dental Association, 143(11), 1199–1204. https://doi.org/10.14219/jada.archive.2012.0064

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free