Prediction of chronic kidney disease in abdominal cancers radiation therapy using the functional assays of normal tissue complication probability models

1Citations
Citations of this article
6Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Aim: The purpose of this study is to predict chronic kidney disease (CKD) in the radiotherapy of abdominal cancers by evaluating clinical and functional assays of normal tissue complication probability (NTCP) models. Materials and Methods: Radiation renal damage was analyzed in 50 patients with abdominal cancers 12 months after radiotherapy through a clinical estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR). According to the common terminology criteria for the scoring system of adverse events, Grade 2 CKD (eGFR ≤30-59 ml/min/1.73 m 2) was considered as the radiation therapy endpoint. Modeling and parameter estimation of NTCP models were performed for the Lyman-equivalent uniform dose (EUD), the logit-EUD critical volume (CV), the relative seriality, and the mean dose model. Results: The confidence interval of the fitted parameters was 95%. The parameter value of D 50 was obtained 22-38 Gy, and the n and s parameters were equivalent to 0.006 -3 and 1, respectively. According to the Akaike's information criterion, the mean dose model predicts radiation-induced CKD more accurately than the other models. Conclusion: Although the renal medulla consists of many nephrons arranged in parallel, each nephron has a seriality architecture as renal functional subunits. Therefore, based on this principle and modeling results in this study, the whole kidney organs may have a serial-parallel combination or a secret architecture.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Haghbin, A., Mostaar, A., Paydar, R., Bakhshandeh, M., Nikoofar, A., Houshyari, M., & Cheraghi, S. (2022). Prediction of chronic kidney disease in abdominal cancers radiation therapy using the functional assays of normal tissue complication probability models. Journal of Cancer Research and Therapeutics, 18(3), 718–724. https://doi.org/10.4103/jcrt.jcrt_179_21

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free