Lower-limb muscle function is influenced by changing mechanical demands in cycling

4Citations
Citations of this article
29Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Although cycling is a seemingly simple, reciprocal task, musclesmust adapt their function to satisfy changes inmechanical demands induced by higher crank torques and faster pedalling cadences. We examined whethermuscle functionwas sensitive to these changes inmechanical demands across a wide range of pedalling conditions. We collected experimental data of cycling where crank torque and pedalling cadence were independently varied from 13 to 44 N m and 60 to 140 rpm. These data were used in conjunction with musculoskeletal simulations and a recently developed functional index-based approach to characterise the role of human lower-limb muscles. We found that in muscles that generate most of the mechanical power and work during cycling, greater crank torque induced shifts towards greater muscle activation, greater positive muscle-tendon unit (MTU)work and amore motor-like function, particularly in the limb extensors. Conversely, with faster pedalling cadence, the same muscles exhibited a phase advance in muscle activity prior to crank top dead centre, which led to greater negative MTU power and work and shifted the muscles to contract with more spring-like behaviour. Our results illustrate the capacity for muscles to adapt their function to satisfy the mechanical demands of the task, even during highly constrained reciprocal tasks such as cycling. Understanding how muscles shift their contractile performance under varied mechanical and environmental demands may informdecisions on how to optimise pedalling performance and to design targeted cycling rehabilitation therapies for muscle-specific injuries or deficits.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Lai, A. K. M., Dick, T. J. M., Brown, N. A. T., Biewener, A. A., & Wakeling, J. M. (2021). Lower-limb muscle function is influenced by changing mechanical demands in cycling. Journal of Experimental Biology, 224(3). https://doi.org/10.1242/jeb.228221

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free