Psychometric properties of the physical activity questionnaire for older children (PAQ-C) in the UK

24Citations
Citations of this article
83Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Objectives: The Physical Activity Questionnaire for Older Children (PAQ-C) is a validated self-report questionnaire designed to assess moderate to vigorous physical activity in children. Currently however, there are no data supporting the use of the PAQ-C in British samples. Design: Two studies using independent samples assessed the psychometric properties of the PAQ-C in children aged 9-11 from the UK. Method: Study one (N=336) examined general test score characteristics, internal reliability, factor structure and construct validity of the PAQ-C with the Self-Report Habit Index (SRHI). Study two (N=131) re-examined the factor structure and assessed convergent validity with BMI and cardiovascular fitness (CVF). Results: The PAQ-C had acceptable item distribution, item total correlations (>.30) and internal reliability (α= .82 & .84). Exploratory factor analyses (EFA) identified two factors which appear to be sensitive to the context in which the activity is performed 'in school' and 'out of school'. The PAQ-C was related to the SRHI (r= 30) and inversely related to CVF ( r=-38) but not with BMI. Conclusions: With the exception of one problematic item; physical activity during PE, several analyses suggested that the PAQ-C had acceptable measurement properties in this group. Pragmatically, the ease of use and efficient format of the PAQ-C makes it a feasible option for large studies and/or when time, money and manpower are limited. That said, further development of the PAQ-C may be required for younger samples and its usefulness for intervention research has yet to be established. © 2014 Elsevier Ltd.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Thomas, E. L., & Upton, D. (2014). Psychometric properties of the physical activity questionnaire for older children (PAQ-C) in the UK. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 15(3), 280–287. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychsport.2014.02.002

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free