Factors determining outcome of corrective osteotomy for malunited paediatric forearm fractures: A systematic review and meta-analysis

19Citations
Citations of this article
52Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

The aim of this study was to identify predictors of a superior functional outcome after corrective osteotomy for paediatric malunited radius and both-bone forearm fractures. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of individual participant data, searching databases up to 1 October 2016. Our primary outcome was the gain in pronosupination seen after corrective osteotomy. Individual participant data of 11 cohort studies were included, concerning 71 participants with a median age of 11 years at trauma. Corrective osteotomy was performed after a median of 12 months after trauma, leading to a mean gain of 77° in pronosupination after a median follow-up of 29 months. Analysis of variance and multiple regression analysis revealed that predictors of superior functional outcome after corrective osteotomy are: an interval between trauma and corrective osteotomy of less than 1 year, an angular deformity of greater than 20° and the use of three-dimensional computer-assisted techniques. Level of evidence: II

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Roth, K. C., Walenkamp, M. M. J., Van Geenen, R. C. I., Reijman, M., Verhaar, J. A. N., & Colaris, J. W. (2017, October 1). Factors determining outcome of corrective osteotomy for malunited paediatric forearm fractures: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Hand Surgery: European Volume. SAGE Publications Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1177/1753193417711684

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free