A randomized controlled trial of a smoking cessation intervention conducted among prisoners

35Citations
Citations of this article
160Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Aim: To evaluate the efficacy of nortriptyline (NOR) added to a multi-component smoking cessation intervention, which included cognitive-behavioural therapy (CBT) and provision of nicotine replacement therapy (NRT). Design: Randomized controlled trial (RCT) comparing two study groups with blinded follow-up at 3, 6 and 12 months. Both groups received a multi-component smoking cessation intervention comprising two half-hour individual sessions of CBT and NRT with either active NOR or placebo. Setting: Prisons in New South Wales (17) and Queensland (one), Australia. Participants: A total of 425 male prisoners met inclusion criteria and were allocated to either treatment (n=206) or control group (n=219). Measurements: Primary end-points at 3, 6 and 12 months were continuous abstinence, point prevalence abstinence and reporting a 50% reduction in smoking. Smoking status was confirmed by expired carbon monoxide, using a cut-point of ≤10 parts per million. Findings: Participants' demographics and baseline tobacco use were similar in treatment and control groups. Based on an intention-to-treat analysis, continuous abstinence between the treatment and control groups was not significantly different at 3 months (23.8 versus 16.4%), 6 months (17.5 versus 12.3%) and 12 months (11.7 versus 11.9%). Conclusion: Adding nortriptyline to a smoking cessation treatment package consisting of behavioural support and nicotine replacement therapy does not appear to improve long-term abstinence rates in male prisoners. © 2012 The Authors, Addiction © 2012 Society for the Study of Addiction.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Richmond, R., Indig, D., Butler, T., Wilhelm, K., Archer, V., & Wodak, A. (2013). A randomized controlled trial of a smoking cessation intervention conducted among prisoners. Addiction, 108(5), 966–974. https://doi.org/10.1111/add.12084

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free