Protection in Inverter-Dominated Grids: Fault Behavior of Grid-Following vs. Grid-Forming Inverters and Mixed Architectures—A Review

Abstract

The rapid rise of inverter-based resources (IBRs) such as solar, wind, and battery energy storage is transforming power grids and creating new challenges for protection. Unlike synchronous generators, many IBRs are interfaced through grid-following (GFL) inverters that operate as controlled current sources and rely on an external voltage reference, resulting in fault responses that are current-limited and controller-shaped. These characteristics reduce fault current magnitude and can undermine conventional protection schemes. In contrast, emerging grid-forming (GFM) inverters behave as voltage sources that establish local voltage and frequency, offering improved disturbance support but still transitioning to current-limited operation under severe faults. This review summarizes GFL versus GFM operating principles and deployments, compares their behavior under balanced and unbalanced faults, and evaluates protection impacts using a protection-relevant taxonomy supported by illustrative electromagnetic transient (EMT) case studies. Key challenges, including underreach/overreach of impedance-based elements, reduced overcurrent sensitivity, and directional misoperation, are identified. Mitigation options are discussed, spanning adaptive/supervised relaying, communication-assisted and differential protection, and inverter-side fault current shaping and GFM integration. The implications of IEEE 1547-2018 and IEEE 2800-2022 are reviewed to clarify ride-through and support requirements that constrain protection design in high-IBR systems.