Informality, global production networks and the dynamics of 'adverse incorporation'

138Citations
Citations of this article
166Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

The neglect of questions of informality in the study of global production networks (GPNs) is curious given the scale and reach of informality in the contemporary global economy. In this article I advocate a tighter integration of informality into the questions and approaches we deploy in the study of GPNs, not simply as an empirical area of enquiry but also in theorizing, first, how GPNs work and, second, with what social consequences. Drawing on 'structuralist' insights into the relationship between informality and formality in capitalist economies, I argue for a recognition of the ways in which these are structurally blended with one another to the extent that their dichotomization is empirically and theoretically misconceived. I go on to explore the ways in which informality is created and exploited within GPNs in a 'top-down' manner - that is, by capital, firms, employers and states - and the 'bottom-up' dynamics of informality, which frequently are constitutive of 'adverse incorporation' in GPNs for large numbers of workers, generating and perpetuating forms of poverty, marginalization and vulnerability. © 2010 Blackwell Publishing Ltd & Global Networks Partnership.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Phillips, N. (2011). Informality, global production networks and the dynamics of “adverse incorporation.” Global Networks, 11(3), 380–397. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-0374.2011.00331.x

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free