Sex and gender differences research design for basic, clinical, and population studies: Essentials for investigators

174Citations
Citations of this article
312Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

A sex- and gender-informed perspective increases rigor, promotes discovery, and expands the relevance of biomedical research. In the current era of accountability to present data for males and females, thoughtful and deliberate methodology can improve study design and inference in sex and gender differences research. We address issues of motivation, subject selection, sample size, data collection, analysis, and interpretation, considering implications for basic, clinical, and population research. In particular, we focus on methods to test sex/gender differences as effect modification or interaction, and discuss why some inferences from sex-stratified data should be viewed with caution. Without careful methodology, the pursuit of sex difference research, despite a mandate from funding agencies, will result in a literature of contradiction. However, given the historic lack of attention to sex differences, the absence of evidence for sex differences is not necessarily evidence of the absence of sex differences. Thoughtfully conceived and conducted sex and gender differences research is needed to drive scientific and therapeutic discovery for all sexes and genders.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Rich-Edwards, J. W., Kaiser, U. B., Chen, G. L., Manson, J. A. E., & Goldstein, J. M. (2018). Sex and gender differences research design for basic, clinical, and population studies: Essentials for investigators. Endocrine Reviews. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1210/er.2017-00246

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free