Associação entre a razão cintura-estatura e hipertensão e síndrome metabólica: Estudo de base populacional

44Citations
Citations of this article
35Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Background: Hypertension and metabolic syndrome are cardiovascular risk factors associated with increased adiposity. In a previous study, waist-to-stature ratio (WSR) was identified as the best obesity index associated with left ventricular hypertrophy. Objective: In this study we compared the ability of this index to identify hypertension and metabolic syndrome with other obesity indexes (body mass index - BMI; waist circumference - WC; and waist-to-hip ratio - WHR) by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analyses. Methods: 1,655 (45.8% men) participants of the MONICA-WHO/ Vitória Project, mean age 45 ± 11 y were investigated. Metabolic syndrome prevalence (ATP-III criteria) was 32.9%, hypertension was 42.4% and obesity was 19.2%. Results: Regarding the ability to identify hypertension, there was a significant WSR superiority in relation to BMI and WC (p < 0.05) regardless of gender, but WHR (p > 0.05). In relation to the ability to identify metabolic syndrome, there was a significant WSR superiority in relation to WHR in men (p < 0.001), but BMI and WC (p = 0.16 and p = 0.9), respectively. However, in women WSR was significantly superior in relation to WHR (p < 0.001) and BMI (p = 0.025), but WC (p = 0.8). The optimal WSR cutoffs are 0.52 and 0.53 for hypertension and 0.53 and 0.54 for metabolic syndrome, for men and women, respectively. Conclusion: Abdominal obesity, identified by WSR as a surrogate, and not overall obesity (BMI as surrogate), is the simplest and best applicable obesity index associated to hypertension and metabolic syndrome in our population.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Rodrigues, S. L., Baldo, M. P., & Mill, J. G. (2010). Associação entre a razão cintura-estatura e hipertensão e síndrome metabólica: Estudo de base populacional. Arquivos Brasileiros de Cardiologia, 95(2), 186–191. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0066-782X2010005000073

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free