Acute toxicity and patient-reported symptom score after conventional versus moderately hypofractionated proton therapy for prostate cancer

7Citations
Citations of this article
17Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Introduction: To confirm the feasibility of hypofractionated proton beam therapy (PBT), we compared the acute adverse event rates and International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) in prostate cancer patients treated with hypofractionated versus conventionally fractionated (2.0 Gy relative biological effectiveness (RBE)/fraction) PBT. Methods: We reviewed 289 patients with prostate cancer, of whom 73, 100, and 116 patients were treated with 2.0, 2.5, and 3.0 Gy (RBE)/fraction, respectively. The endpoints were acute genitourinary and gastrointestinal toxicities and the IPSS, evaluated up to 6 months after PBT initiation. Results: No significant differences were found in acute toxicity rates or the IPSS among the fractionation schedules. Diabetes mellitus, age, and androgen deprivation therapy were not identified as factors associated with the IPSS. Conclusion: There were no significant differences in adverse events or quality of life among the three fractionation schedules early after PBT.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Iizumi, T., Ishikawa, H., Sekino, Y., Tanaka, K., Takizawa, D., Makishima, H., … Sakurai, H. (2022). Acute toxicity and patient-reported symptom score after conventional versus moderately hypofractionated proton therapy for prostate cancer. Journal of Medical Radiation Sciences, 69(2), 198–207. https://doi.org/10.1002/jmrs.551

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free