Technical Aspects and Clinical Outcomes of Robotic Ureteroscopy: Is It Ready for Primetime?

22Citations
Citations of this article
15Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Purpose of Review: Robotic surgery in urology has already been widely employed in robotic-assisted laparoscopic surgery for minimally invasive procedures (MIS). We wanted to analyse rapidly developing robotic ureteroscopy (RoboURS) for the treatment of renal stone disease. Recent Findings: A comprehensive literature review was performed for technical aspects and clinical outcomes of RoboURS. RoboURS has made significant breakthroughs with each model proving that this technology improves ergonomics and supports surgeon and instrument longevity while minimising musculoskeletal issues in retrograde intra-renal surgery (RIRS). Further randomised controlled trials are required to compare the efficacy of RoboURS vs manual flexible ureteroscopy (FURS). The cost-effectiveness will also need to be assessed prior to widespread acceptance into urological infrastructure and mainstream practice. Summary: RoboURS continues to evolve despite the limitations of infrastructure and cost-effectiveness. It holds the promise of a better future for surgeon longevity, reduced peri-operative morbidity and better workplace environment.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Sinha, M. M., Gauhar, V., Tzelves, L., Tefik, T., Ergul, R. B., Juliebø-Jones, P., & Somani, B. K. (2023, August 1). Technical Aspects and Clinical Outcomes of Robotic Ureteroscopy: Is It Ready for Primetime? Current Urology Reports. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11934-023-01167-4

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free