Predictors, outcome and characteristics of oropharyngeal dysphagia in idiopathic inflammatory myopathy

14Citations
Citations of this article
25Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Introduction: Oropharyngeal dysphagia is a clinical hallmark of idiopathic inflammatory myopathy (IIM). This study investigated predictors, outcome, and characteristics of oropharyngeal dysphagia in patients with different types of IIM. Methods: Flexible endoscopic evaluation of swallowing (FEES) videos of 71 IIM patients were retrospectively analyzed for bolus spillage, penetration, aspiration, and pharyngeal residue. Based on these findings, dysphagia severity was rated. Regression analyses were performed to investigate demographic and disease-specific predictors of dysphagia severity and pneumonia as outcome-relevant complications of dysphagia. A score was developed to rate the quality of the endoscopic white-out as a surrogate marker for pharyngeal muscle weakness with consecutive residue. Results: Our analysis revealed no independent predictors of dysphagia severity. Dysphagia severity, however, was an independent predictor for pneumonia, which occurred in 24% of patients. Pharyngeal residue with risk of postdeglutitive aspiration was the most common dysphagia pattern. Attenuation of the endoscopic white-out was related to residue severity. Discussion: Dysphagia in IIM assessed with FEES is associated with relevant complications, such as aspiration pneumonia, and must be considered independently of peripheral muscle weakness and disease duration. Swallowing impairment mainly presents with pharyngeal residue. The quality of the white-out may serve as a semi-quantitative surrogate marker for pharyngeal contractility.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Labeit, B., Perlova, K., Pawlitzki, M., Ruck, T., Muhle, P., Claus, I., … Warnecke, T. (2021). Predictors, outcome and characteristics of oropharyngeal dysphagia in idiopathic inflammatory myopathy. Muscle and Nerve, 63(6), 874–880. https://doi.org/10.1002/mus.27225

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free