A high glycemic burden relates to functional and metabolic alterations of human monocytes in patients with type 1 diabetes

15Citations
Citations of this article
31Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Diabetes is associated with increased cardiovascular risk and higher occurrence of infections. These complications suggest altered responses of the innate immune system. Recent studies have shown that energy metabolism of monocytes is crucial in determining their functionality. Here we investigate whether monocyte metabolism and function are changed in patients with diabetes and aim to identify diabetes-associated factors driving these altera-tions. Patients with type 1 diabetes (T1D) (n = 41) and healthy age-, sex-, and BMI-matched control subjects (n = 20) were recruited. Monocytes were isolated from peripheral blood to determine immune functionality, metabolic responses, and transcriptome profiles. Upon ex vivo stimulation with Toll-like receptor (TLR) 4 or TLR-2 agonists, monocytes of patients with T1D secreted lower levels of various cytokines and showed lower glycolytic rates compared with monocytes isolated from matched control subjects. Stratification based on HbA1c levels revealed that lower cytokine secretion was coupled to higher glycolytic rate of monocytes in patients with a higher glycemic burden. Circulating monocytes dis-played an enhanced inflammatory gene expression profile associated with high glycemic burden. These results suggest that a high glycemic burden in patients with T1D is relatedtoexpressionofinflammatory genes of monocytes and is associated with an impaired relationship between metabolism and inflammatory function upon activation.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Thiem, K., van Dierendonck, X. A. M. H., Janssen, A. W. M., Boogaard, J. P., Riksen, N. P., Tack, C. J., & Stienstra, R. (2020). A high glycemic burden relates to functional and metabolic alterations of human monocytes in patients with type 1 diabetes. Diabetes, 69(12), 2735–2746. https://doi.org/10.2337/db20-0568

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free