Bad apples or rotten orchards? Public attitudes of interactions with police and the role of political ideology

3Citations
Citations of this article
7Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this study is to explore the ideological gaps across a range of policing interactions with the public. Design/methodology/approach: In a survey distributed via Mechanical Turk (MTurk) (n = 979), the authors explore the role that respondents' political ideology plays in the agreement of 13 aspects of policing services, their demeanor and decorum. Findings: Attitudes toward policing interactions are slightly positive. Conservatives steadfastly hold positive attitudes about police. Liberals vacillate from negative to positive attitudes across the 13 policing interaction statements. Social implications: Although small, there is an ideological consensus that police adequately protect citizens and are knowledgeable about the law. Originality/value: Even at record lows of public confidence in the police, some subsections of the sample, such as conservatives, firmly hold positive attitudes about police. The unwavering support for police by conservatives continues across the multi-item measure of policing interactions, whereas liberals illustrated less uniformity in their attitudes.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Hansen, M. A., & Navarro, J. C. (2023). Bad apples or rotten orchards? Public attitudes of interactions with police and the role of political ideology. Policing, 46(5–6), 861–877. https://doi.org/10.1108/PIJPSM-07-2023-0098

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free