Relationship between Learning Strategies and Academic Achievement in Medical College and Graduate Medical School Students

  • Shin H
  • Jeon W
  • Yang E
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
24Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Purpose: Cognitive researchers assume that learning strategies are related to three types of learning processes: 'surface learning,' 'strategy learning,' and 'deep learning.' A 'deep learning' approach is widely accepted to be associated with long-term success in medical school, contributing to the development of doctors who take desirable approaches to self-directed learning and studying in medical practice. Therefore, this study measured how medical students learn and determined whether the use of learning strategies differs between high and low academic performers. In addition, we compared medical college students with graduate medical school students with regard to the use of learning strategies.; Methods: To explore the learning strategies of students and their relation to academic achievement, we performed LIST (Learning Strategies in Higher Education Inventory) in a sample of 111 Year 1 medical students.; Results: Medical students with high academic performance scored higher in most learning strategies than low performers. Additionally, learning strategies were used more frequently by graduate medical school students than medical students, specifically with regard to organization, elaboration, critical thinking, and time management.; Conclusion: We conclude that learning strategy instruments provide information that enables medical students to optimize their study. To foster deep learning and intrinsic motivation in students, it might also be necessary to adopt more changes in teaching and assessment in medical schools.;

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Shin, H.-I., Jeon, W. T., & Yang, E. B. (2010). Relationship between Learning Strategies and Academic Achievement in Medical College and Graduate Medical School Students. Korean Journal of Medical Education, 22(3), 197–204. https://doi.org/10.3946/kjme.2010.22.3.197

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free