Metaphysics or Metaphors for the Anthropocene? Scientific Naturalism and the Agency of Things

3Citations
Citations of this article
8Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

In this paper, I provide the outlines of an alternative metaphilosophical orientation for Continental philosophy, namely, a form of scientific naturalism that has proximate roots in the work of Bachelard and Althusser. I describe this orientation as an "alternative"insofar as it provides a framework for doing justice to some of the motivations behind the recent revival of metaphysics in Continental philosophy, in particular its ecological-ethical motivations. In the second section of the paper, I demonstrate how ecological-ethical issues motivate new metaphysicians like Bruno Latour, Jane Bennett, Timothy Morton, Ian Bogost, and Graham Harman to impute to objects real features of agency. I also try to show how their commitments lead to deep ambiguities in their metaphysical projects. In the final section, I outline a type of scientific naturalism in Continental philosophy that parallels the sort of naturalism championed by Quine, both conceptually and historically, and suggest that it might serve our ecological-ethical purposes better.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Gamez, P. (2018). Metaphysics or Metaphors for the Anthropocene? Scientific Naturalism and the Agency of Things. Open Philosophy, 1(1), 191–212. https://doi.org/10.1515/opphil-2018-0014

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free