Gaia or knowledge without spheres

2Citations
Citations of this article
4Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Since Plato’s time the sphere has been seen as the best, most perfect, and beautiful geometrical figure; it’s supposed to say everything at once, put everything in its proper order, and provide the whole picture. The obsession with spheres has nothing to do with practice. So why do we keep thinking of knowledge as a sphere? Is there a way to get rid of the sphere as a basic model of understanding? I’ll make three points in this chapter: one about data and the aesthetics of knowledge, another about the strangeness of naturalism, and a last one about an old discrepancy between two kinds of spheres. In conclusion, I will show how that discrepancy can help us see the challenges of confronting the Anthropocene and Gaia.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Latour, B. (2017). Gaia or knowledge without spheres. In Aesthetics of Universal Knowledge (pp. 169–201). Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-42595-5_8

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free