Utility of uterine artery Doppler ultrasound imaging in predicting preeclampsia during pregnancy: a meta-analysis

13Citations
Citations of this article
45Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Aims: Accurate prediction of preeclampsia could improve maternal outcomes. However, the role of uterine artery Doppler ultrasound in predicting preeclampsia remains unclear. Materials and methods: We comprehensively searched several electronic databases, including PubMed, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library, and Web of Science, covering studies published from the time of database creation to September 23, 2023. Studies on the predictive value of uterine artery Doppler ultrasound for preeclampsia were included. The primary pregnancy outcome was preeclampsia. The risk of bias was assessed using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-2 scoring scale. Results: The use of resistance index (RI) for predicting preeclampsia demonstrated the highest sensitivity of 0.73 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.30–0.94) and specificity of 0.90 (95% CI, 0.72–0.97), with a pooled area under the curve value of 0.91 (95% CI, 0.88–0.93). The use of pulsatility index (PI) for predicting preeclampsia showed a sensitivity of 0.65 (95% CI, 0.45–0.81) and specificity of 0.88 (95% CI, 0.77–0.94). Furthermore, preeclampsia prediction via notching showed a sensitivity of 0.54 (95% CI, 0.38–0.68) and specificity of 0.89 (95% CI, 0.79–0.95). Conclusions: These findings highlight the varying predictive performance of different preeclampsia indices. PI and RI demonstrated moderate-to-high sensitivity and specificity, whereas notching exhibited relatively lower sensitivity but comparable specificity. Further research and validation are warranted to consolidate these results and enhance the accuracy of preeclampsia prediction.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Cao, L., He, B., Zhou, Y., Chen, T., Gao, Y., & Yao, B. (2024). Utility of uterine artery Doppler ultrasound imaging in predicting preeclampsia during pregnancy: a meta-analysis. Medical Ultrasonography, 26(2), 197–204. https://doi.org/10.11152/mu-4355

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free