Evaluation of dental students’ tooth preparation skills using conventional phantom labs versus advanced simulation technologies: a comparative study

1Citations
Citations of this article
42Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Background: Preclinical training is essential in dental education for developing psychomotor and clinical skills. Conventional phantom models are widely used, though they lack real-time tactile feedback. This study aimed to compare the effectiveness of conventional phantom training with that of advanced simulation-based systems in improving dental students’ tooth preparation skills. Methods: This randomized controlled trial included 40 s-year dental students (N = 40) with no prior experience in simulation. Participants were randomly assigned to either conventional phantom training or virtual reality (VR) based simulation. Both groups received 10 h of training. Pre- and post-tests involved preparing tooth 46 with a chamfer finish line. Performances were assessed using five criteria: parallelism, occlusal reduction, taper angle, finish line standardization, and presence of undercuts. Each was scored on a 0–10 scale by a blinded evaluator. Statistical analyses were performed using ANOVA with post hoc tests at a significance level of p

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Kızılırmak, B., Gözen, M., & Güntekin, N. (2025). Evaluation of dental students’ tooth preparation skills using conventional phantom labs versus advanced simulation technologies: a comparative study. BMC Medical Education, 25(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-025-08020-x

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free