Assessment of a 96-well plate assay of quantitative drug susceptibility testing for mycobacterium tuberculosis complex in China

13Citations
Citations of this article
54Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Objective To evaluate the performance of the Sensitire MYCOTB MIC Plate (MYCOTB) which could measure the twelve anti-tuberculosis drugs susceptibility on one 96-wells plate. Methods A total of 140 MDR-TB strains and 60 non-MDR strains were sub-cultured and 193 strains were finally tested for drug resistance using MYCOTB and agar proportion method (APM) and another 7 strains failed of subculture. The drugs included ofloxacin (Ofx), moxifloxacin (Mfx), rifampin (RFP), amikacin (Am), rifabutin (Rfb), para-aminosalicylic acid (PAS), ethionamide (Eth), isoniazid (INH), kanamycin (Km), ethambutol (EMB), streptomycin (Sm), and cycloserine(Cs). The categorical agreement, conditional agreement, sensitivity and specificity of MYCOTB were assessed in comparison with APM. For strains with inconsistent results between MYCOTB and APM, the drug resistance related gene fragments were amplified and sequenced: gyrA for Ofx and Mfx; rpoB for RFP and Rfb; embB for EMB; rpsl for Sm; katG and the promoter region of inhA for INH, ethA and the promoter region of inhA for Eth. The sequence results were compared with results of MYCOTB and APM to analyze the consistency between sequence results and MYCOTB or APM. Results The categorical agreement between two methods for each drug ranged from 88.6% to 100%. It was the lowest for INH (88.6%). The sensitivity and specificity of MYCOTB ranged from 71.4% to 100% and 84.3% to 100%, respectively. The sensitivity was lowest for Cs (71.4%), EMB at 10ìg/ml (80.0%) and INH at 10.0ìg/ml (84.6%). The specificity was lowest for Rfb (84.3%). Overall discordance between the two phenotypic methods was observed for 96 strains, of which 63 (65.6%) were found susceptible with APM and resistant with MYCOTB and the remaining 33(34.4%) strains were resistant by APM and susceptible with MYCOTB. 34/52 (65.4%) sequenced APM susceptible and MYCOTB resistant(APM-S/MYCOTB-R) strains had mutations or insertions in the amplified regions. 20/30 (66.7%) sequenced APM resistant and MYCOTB susceptible strains had mutations in the sequenced genes. MICs of twenty-nine of these thirty isolates were equal to or within 1 doubling dilution of the critical concentration. Conclusion MYCOTB had good performance for most of tested drugs and could be used as an alternative to the more labor demanding and longer turnaround time solid culture based DST method for detection of drug susceptibility in China.

References Powered by Scopus

National survey of drug-resistant tuberculosis in China

597Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Molecular detection of mutations associated with first- and second-line drug resistance compared with conventional drug susceptibility testing of Mycobacterium tuberculosis

326Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

gyrA mutations and phenotypic susceptibility levels to ofloxacin and moxifloxacin in clinical isolates of Mycobacterium tuberculosis

105Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Drug resistance mechanisms and drug susceptibility testing for tuberculosis

83Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Validating a 14-drug microtiter plate containing bedaquiline and delamanid for large-scale research susceptibility testing of mycobacterium tuberculosis

61Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Strong Increase in Moxifloxacin Resistance Rate among Multidrug-Resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis Isolates in China, 2007 to 2013

22Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Xia, H., Zheng, Y., Zhao, B., Van Den Hof, S., Cobelens, F., & Zhao, Y. (2017). Assessment of a 96-well plate assay of quantitative drug susceptibility testing for mycobacterium tuberculosis complex in China. PLoS ONE, 12(1). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0169413

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 22

76%

Researcher 5

17%

Professor / Associate Prof. 1

3%

Lecturer / Post doc 1

3%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Medicine and Dentistry 10

32%

Immunology and Microbiology 10

32%

Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Bi... 8

26%

Nursing and Health Professions 3

10%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free