Investment banks as corporate monitors in the early twentieth century United States

28Citations
Citations of this article
71Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

We study the effect of fnancial relationships on frms' investment decisions and access to external fnance. In the early twentieth century, securities underwriters commonly held directorships with American corporations. Section 10 of the Clayton Antitrust Act prohibited bankers from serving on the boards of railroads for which they underwrote securities. We fnd that following the implementation of Section 10, railroads with strong preexisting relationships with underwriters saw declines in their investment rates, valuations, and leverage, and increases in their costs of external funds. Reassuringly, we do not observe similar effects among industrials and utilities, which were not subject to Section 10. Our results are consistent with underwriters on corporate boards acting as delegated monitors, and highlight the potential for regulations intended to address conflicts of interest to disrupt valuable information flows.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Frydman, C., & Hilt, E. (2017, July 1). Investment banks as corporate monitors in the early twentieth century United States. American Economic Review. American Economic Association. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.20150143

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free