Predictive value of microalbuminuria in patients with insulin-dependent diabetes of long duration

137Citations
Citations of this article
20Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Objective - To investigate the predictive value of microalbuminuria (albumin excretion rate 30-300 mg/24 h) as a risk factor for overt diabetic nephropathy in patients with longstanding insulin dependent diabetes. Design - 10 year follow up of patients with normoalbuminuria (albumin excretion rate < 30 mg/24 h), microalbuminuria (30-300 mg/24 h), and macroalbuminuria (> 300 mg/24 h) based on two out of three timed overnight urine samples. Setting - Outpatient clinic of Helsinki University Hospital. Subjects - 72 consecutive patients who had had insulin dependent diabetes for over 15 years. Main outcome measures - Urinary albumin excretion rate, mortality, and prevalence of diabetic complications after 10 years. Results - 56 patients were re-examined at 10 year follow up, 10 had died, five were lost to follow up, and one was excluded because of non-diabetic kidney disease. At initial screening 22 patients had macroalbuminuria, 18 had microalbuminuria, and 26 had normal albumin excretion. Only five (28%, 95% confidence interval 10% to 54%) of the microalbuminuric patients developed macroalbuminuria during the 10 year follow up and none developed end stage renal failure. Two (8%, 1% to 25%) normoalbuminuric patients developed macroalbuminuria and four (15%, 4% to 35%) became microalbuminuric. Seven (32%, 14% to 55%) of the macroalbuminuric patients developed end stage renal failure and six (27%, 11% to 50%) died of cardiovascular complications. Conclusion - Microalbuminuria is not a good predictor of progression to overt nephropathy in patients with longstanding insulin dependent diabetes.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Forsblom, C. M., Groop, P. H., Ekstrand, A., & Groop, L. C. (1992). Predictive value of microalbuminuria in patients with insulin-dependent diabetes of long duration. British Medical Journal, 305(6861), 1051–1053. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.305.6861.1051

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free