The bias/variance trade-off when estimating the MR signal magnitude from the complex average of repeated measurements

3Citations
Citations of this article
26Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

The signal-dependent bias of MR images has been considered a hindrance to visual interpretation almost since the beginning of clinical MRI. Over time, a variety of procedures have been suggested to produce less-biased images from the complex average of repeated measurements. In this work, we re-evaluate these approaches using first a survey of previous estimators in the MRI literature, then a survey of the methods statisticians employ for our specific problem. Our conclusions are substantially different from much of the previous work: first, removing bias completely is impossible if we demand the estimator have bounded variance; second, reducing bias may not be beneficial to image quality. Copyright © 2011 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Tisdall, M. D., Lockhart, R. A., & Atkins, M. S. (2011). The bias/variance trade-off when estimating the MR signal magnitude from the complex average of repeated measurements. Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, 66(5), 1456–1467. https://doi.org/10.1002/mrm.22910

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free