Skip to main content

The advocacy continuum: Towards a theory of advocacy in journalism

14Citations
Citations of this article
47Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

The goal of advocacy is commonly used to distinguish journalism from public relations practice. At the same time, there is a strong tradition of advocacy reporting in journalism that weakens this point of distinction. In an attempt to reconcile this apparent contradiction, this article draws on the concept of a continuum to explain extremes in journalism practice and 'contingency theory' in public relations, which posits a range of variables can influence the degree of advocacy adopted by public relations practitioners when dealing with an organization's target publics. This article contends that the degree and type of advocacy present in journalism is also dependent on a range of macro, organizational, journalism production, source and personal factors. It argues that each work of journalism falls along a continuum of advocacy, ranging from subtle displays at one end to overt at the other, where some stories might be hard to distinguish from public relations.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Fisher, C. (2016). The advocacy continuum: Towards a theory of advocacy in journalism. Journalism, 17(6), 711–726. https://doi.org/10.1177/1464884915582311

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free