RT-PCR detection of SARS-CoV-2 in nasopharyngeal and salivary specimens: contribution of alternative collection systems and extraction processes to cope with mass screening. Interpretation of low viral loads

2Citations
Citations of this article
5Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Objectives: Due to massive screening of the persistent coronavirus SARS-CoV-2, supply difficulties emerged for swabs and extraction reagents leading to test alternative choices. Quality sampling may have an impact on the result and a low RNA detection may be difficult to interpret because it does not necessarily mean that infectious particles are present in biological samples. There is a need to understand whether the Ct value information is relevant and informative. Methods: We compared the pre-analytical stability of RNA in saline solution, UTM®, Amies and Cary-Blair transport media. Expression profile of E, N and RdRp genes was assessed at various concentration levels with the Allplex™ 2019-nCoV Assay. Factors that may influence the determination of Ct were studied with several extraction reagents coupled to the GSD NovaPrime® SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR testing kit. Results: Seventy two-hour RNA stability has been demonstrated for all the transport media assessed. A matrix effect was shown, leading to a decrease in the detection of E and RdRp genes, so that only N gene was often found for Ct greater than 35.0. A follow-up over more than 67,000 patients suggests that N gene may be a sensitive indicator to detect a new active viral circulation, but establishing a correlation between a positive threshold and a low risk of infection for a given method remains difficult. Conclusions: Several transport media and extraction processes are suitable for PCR-based SARS-CoV-2 detection. During periods of active virus circulation, any weakly positive results should be considered.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Robinet, S., Parisot, F., Cochonot, L., Schiltz, B., Paboeuf, C., Nedelec, C., … Heddebaut, A. (2022). RT-PCR detection of SARS-CoV-2 in nasopharyngeal and salivary specimens: contribution of alternative collection systems and extraction processes to cope with mass screening. Interpretation of low viral loads. Journal of Laboratory Medicine, 46(2), 99–106. https://doi.org/10.1515/labmed-2021-0157

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free