Differences in neuroradiology training programs around the world

6Citations
Citations of this article
12Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: No previous study compares neuroradiology training programs and teaching schedules across the globe, to our knowledge. This study was conducted to better understand international program requisites. MATERIALSANDMETHODS: Data from 43 countries were collected by an e-mail-based questionnaire (response rate, 84.0%). Radiologists across the world were surveyed regarding the neuroradiology training schemes in their institutions. Answers were verified by officers of the national neuroradiology societies. RESULTS: While many countries do not provide fellowship training in neuroradiology (n =16), others have formal postresidency curricula (n = 27). Many programs have few fellows and didactic sessions, but the 1- or 2-year duration of fellowship training is relatively consistent (n = 23/27, 85%). CONCLUSIONS: There is a wide variety of fellowship offerings, lessons provided, and ratios of teachers to learners in neuroradiology training programs globally.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Schneider, T., Huisman, T. A. G. M., Fiehler, J., Savic, L. J., & Yousem, D. M. (2015, March 1). Differences in neuroradiology training programs around the world. American Journal of Neuroradiology. American Society of Neuroradiology. https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A4132

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free