Perioperative antibiotic prophylaxis: Improved compliance and impact on infection rates

35Citations
Citations of this article
41Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

The aims of this study were to determine adherence to the perioperative antibiotic prophylaxis (PAP) protocol used at a large Italian teaching hospital during a 6-year period, to assess the variables associated with inappropriate administration, and to measure the impact on surgical site infection (SSI) rates. There were 28 621 patients surveyed of which 74·6% received PAP. An improvement in adherence to the PAP protocol was registered for 58·8% of patients. Significant risk factors were an American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score ≥2 [odds ratios (OR) from 1·28 (95% confidence interval (CI) 1·19-1·37) to 1·87 (95% CI 1·43-2·44)], prolonged duration of surgery (OR 1·68, 95% CI 1·56-1·82) and urgent surgery (OR 2·16, 95% CI 1·96-2·37). During the study period, a significant reduction in SSIs rates was detected. We concluded that the global reduction of inadequate PAP administration signifies the efficacy of a multidisciplinary quality improvement initiative on antimicrobial utilization, and this is supported by the observed reduction of the SSI rate. © Copyright Cambridge University Press 2010.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Prospero, E., Barbadoro, P., Marigliano, A., Martini, E., & D’Errico, M. M. (2011). Perioperative antibiotic prophylaxis: Improved compliance and impact on infection rates. Epidemiology and Infection, 139(9), 1326–1331. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0950268810002505

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free