Am I Supposed to Create Knowledge?: Pedagogical Challenges of Doctoral Mentors

2Citations
Citations of this article
23Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

This paper discusses the nature and characteristics of doctoral dissertation learning and the role of mentor in the dissertation stage. Doctoral level education requires a considerable degree of learner's independent thinking. While independence has been discussed as a personal trait or in relation to the socialization of doctoral education, independence has rarely been discussed as a higher level of cognitive development necessary to create new knowledge. When students transition from a consumer of knowledge to a creator/owner of knowledge, they are required to adopt a new epistemology, i.e., a new way of knowing. How do doctoral advisors/mentors successfully open students to a new way of knowing? This paper addresses the pedagogical foundations of doctoral advising. Drawing on theories of student-centered pedagogy and self-directed learning, this paper attempts to conceptualize the doctoral supervisor's role in the case of doctoral supervision.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Choi, J. A. (2019). Am I Supposed to Create Knowledge?: Pedagogical Challenges of Doctoral Mentors. Educational Process: International Journal, 8(2), 145–152. https://doi.org/10.22521/edupij.2019.82.5

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free