© D. Staub et al. The side crushing test is commonly used to characterize the mechanical strength of catalyst supports. However its interpretation is complex for cylindrical supports due to their irregular geometry and the various fracture modes induced. A better analysis of the crushing test, altogether with a comparison of the results obtained with the three-Point Bending test (3PB) and an analysis of the defects present within the supports, provide a better interpretation of their crushing strength data. Experimental results show that two different fracture modes appear during the crushing test - one under bending configuration and one under crushing configuration - inducing a large scatter of the data. Moreover, a comparison with the 3PB test shows that the strength measured in crushing is lower and the scatter of the data is larger than the ones obtained in bending. This is a consequence of aWeibull size effect and of the presence of macro-defects within one type of the tested supports. It is concluded that an analysis of the fracture modes activated during crushing has to be carried out to obtain a correct distribution of the strength data. The presence of macro-defects within the microstructure of the supports decreases drastically the crushing strength, while their influence on the bending strength is more limited.
CITATION STYLE
Staub, D., Meille, S., Le Corre, V., Chevalier, J., & Rouleau, L. (2015). Revisiting the Side Crushing Test Using the Three-Point Bending Test for the Strength Measurement of Catalyst Supports. Oil & Gas Science and Technology – Revue d’IFP Energies Nouvelles, 70(3), 475–486. https://doi.org/10.2516/ogst/2013214
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.