Confucianism, the idea of Min-pen, and democracy

24Citations
Citations of this article
8Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

With few exceptions, it is believed that Confucianism is incompatible with democracy. The 'incompatibility thesis' has attained the status of near orthodoxy. It is shared by commentators who are hostile as well as those sympathetic to Chinese culture generally and to Confucianism in particular. The arguments for incompatibility typically stress the differences between on the one hand 'democratic values' such as liberty, equality and plurality, and on the other 'Confucian values' such as duty, responsibility and loyalty. Having challenged the arguments for incompatibility by showing that the differences between so-called democratic values and Confucian values are in fact greatly exaggerated, the paper proceeds to discuss the significance of the Confucian idea of min-pen (or min-ben, people as roots). The aim is to show that philosophical Confucianism is not only not an obstacle to democracy but could well be the foundation thereof. The argument will then be further reinforced by revisiting the old 'modernization thesis'.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Nuyen, A. T. (2000). Confucianism, the idea of Min-pen, and democracy. Copenhagen Journal of Asian Studies, (14), 130–151. https://doi.org/10.22439/cjas.v14i1.2154

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free