Invited commentary: Some advantages of the relative excess risk due to interaction (RERI)-Towards better estimators of additive interaction

31Citations
Citations of this article
55Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

In the accompanying commentary, Rose and van der Laan (Am J Epidemiol. 2014;179(6):663-669) criticize the relative excess risk due to interaction (RERI) measure, the use of additive interaction, and the weighting approach we developed to assess RERI with case-control data. In this commentary, we note some of the advantages of using additive measures of interaction, such as RERI, in making decisions about targeting interventions toward certain subgroups and in assessing mechanistic interaction. We discuss the relationship between Rose and van der Laan's estimator for case-control data and the one we had previously proposed. We also develop a new doubly robust estimator for determining the RERI with case-control data when the prevalence or incidence of the outcome is known. © 2014 The Author.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Vanderweele, T. J., & Vansteelandt, S. (2014). Invited commentary: Some advantages of the relative excess risk due to interaction (RERI)-Towards better estimators of additive interaction. American Journal of Epidemiology. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/aje/kwt316

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free