The impact of topical NSAID treatment on selective laser trabeculoplasty efficacy

3Citations
Citations of this article
5Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Purpose: Selective laser trabeculoplasty (SLT) is a first-line intervention for glaucoma, with the aim to reduce the intraocular pressure (IOP). Topical non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are sometimes prescribed after SLT. However, it has been proposed that such treatment may either increase or reduce SLT efficacy. The purpose of this study was to investigate this further. Methods: The study was a retrospective chart review, including 192 eyes of 192 patients, half of which received a course of NSAID eyedrops after SLT. Absolute and relative IOP reduction 3–12 weeks after SLT was compared. Furthermore, subgroup analyses, a multiple linear regression analysis, and a Kaplan–Meier survival analysis regarding time to treatment escalation were performed. Results: The mean absolute IOP reduction was 4.3 ± 3.4 mmHg in the NSAID group and 5.4 ± 4.1 mmHg in the control group (p = 0.049). Relative IOP reduction was 17.5% ± 13.0% and 21.8% ± 14.8% in the NSAID and control groups, respectively (p = 0.033). The same tendency of superior results in control eyes compared with NSAID eyes was seen in an extensive subgroup analysis. A multiple linear regression analysis confirmed NSAID treatment as a negative predictor of IOP reduction after adjustment for covariates (p = 0.023). Survival analysis showed a longer median time to treatment escalation in the control group, though not statistically significant. Conclusion: Topical NSAID treatment was not associated with an increased SLT efficacy. On the contrary, the present study is the first to demonstrate that SLT effectiveness may even be reduced by NSAIDs.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Dahlgren, T., Ayala, M., & Zetterberg, M. (2023). The impact of topical NSAID treatment on selective laser trabeculoplasty efficacy. Acta Ophthalmologica, 101(3), 266–276. https://doi.org/10.1111/aos.15276

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free