In paragraph four of the discussion in the original article [1], as published, some amino acid alterations from other studies were incorrectly cited. The corrected text appears below. In the fourth paragraph of the “Discussion” part in the original article, all G408L should be corrected to Q408L (including when in G408L/A448T), and L276A/L419F should be corrected to K276N/L419F. Additionally, “in our study, also” should be inserted between “F415S and” and “F415V” in the second sentence “In agreement with our findings, prior reports have found that T. rubrum isolates with F415S and F415V variants have more retarded growth than WT isolates”.
CITATION STYLE
Astvad, K. M. T., Hare, R. K., Jørgensen, K. M., Saunte, D. M. L., Thomsen, P. K., & Arendrup, M. C. (2022, August 1). Correction: Astvad et al. Increasing Terbinafine Resistance in Danish Trichophyton Isolates 2019–2020, (J. Fungi, (2022), 8, (150), 10.3390/jof8020150). Journal of Fungi. MDPI. https://doi.org/10.3390/jof8080801
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.